Ignorance Is Strength: The Orwellian World Post-11th September
Shawwāl 23, 1432 A.H, Thursday, September 22, 2011

“Where the limit of our ignorance lies, it is also as far as there where the zone of the Empirical strength extends. To fight the strength of the empire is the same as fighting our own ignorance.”
------------------------------------------------
A political fiction novel, “1984”, authored by George Orwell (published in 1949) dramatically tells about the terrifying world of the future . That world is inhabited by humans who are slaves to one of the three superpower states, each is headed by an authoritarian single-party, that are at war with each other. Each state has its own system to fool its subjects through the manipulated media. The minds are controlled, behaviours are observed, purely for the sake of justifying the actions of the tyrants who are only concerned with power than with their people. This is the Orwellian world (from the name of the author).
The NIC (National
Intelligence Council) in 2004 listed the Orwellian world as one of the future
scenarios, besides three other scenarios: The Rise of China-India, Pax Americana
(America continues to be the ruler of the world) and The Khilafah of Islam.
However, as if we've got a picture of the near-certainty that the Orwellian
world is no other than the Pax Americana itself. The United States of America is
the empire that claims to bring democracy but supporting the dictatorial
regimes. So they are then fooling the people of the world through the global
system that seem friendly: the World Bank, UN, WHO, IMF, UNICEF. The duping is
then performed through the mass media to justify their arrogance.
Noam Chomsky in his book, "Pot Calling the Kettle: America the Terrorist? "
introduced a term to facilitate us in naming the duping system, i.e. “newspeak”.
The newspeak is a system of 'term reversal'. Every term can be emptied of its
original meaning to be given a new meaning, next it would be propagandized
through the mass media, books, a series of seminars, conference and intellectual
works. When the term reaches our ears or eyes, our minds will automatically
interpret it with a new meaning, because when we insist with the old (original)
meaning, suddenly our minds would feel weird, awkward, secluded and
criminalized.
For example, imagine the word “terrorism” in your mind, what do you see? Why
Muslims, why Imam Samudera, Osama, Al-Qaeda? Don't you think about the Khmer
Rouge? Or the military that carried out a coup d'etat against the
(democratically) elected president of Chile, Savador Allende on 11th September
1973? Input the name of “Abu Bakar Ba’asyir” into your mind . What comes to your
mind? What file appears? Yes, he was the leader the Jama'ah Islamiyah, a leader
of the Indonesian branch of Al-Qaeda who commanded the bombing actions from
behind bars. Enter the word “Islamic Shari'ah” or “Khilafah”, then comes the
world of the conservative, cruel Wahhabi and repression of women and so on.
Newspeak also applies to other terms such as militant, freedom, mutual-respect,
radicalism, etc. Why don't we think of other meanings? Perhaps we think of other
meanings, but soon we feel alienated, strange and rebellious.
Such is how America control the mind of the people of the world so that they are
in the same flow with their ideology. Chomsky called it “the American
Ideological System”. The mind is the first thing that must be controlled by
America in order to be successful in a war against a new enemy. That is why, it
was said, early in the morning after the 11th September 2001 attack, George W.
Bush had already called on for the ban of the book “Kitab Tawheed” written by
Sheikh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab, similar to the former vice president of
Indonesia in the previous period who called for the banning of all books by
Sayid Quthb. Books are the shapers of the mind, which must also be controlled
(by America). Then the mind is controlled through the electronic media, from the
CNN to the TVOne, notice how the above terms enter into our minds with new
meanings, shaping our mind so as to be in line with their ideology.
When the human mind is fed with old terms with new meanings, and then the humans
got befooled by it, perhaps this is what's called jahiliyah (ignorance), similar
to the jahiliyah of the pre-Islam Makkah. It's not that jahiliyah cannot be
purge and retaught (from basic), unless it is the ignorance from true sense of
the word. Thus, Prophet Muhammad SAW, soon after being appointed to be a
Prophet, endeavoured to redefine the terms, starting from the interpretation of
the term “god” (rabb, ilah). (It is also on this basis that Syed Naquib al-Attas,
an Indonesian born Malaysian intellectual, developed the “Islamisasi Ilmu
Pengetahuan” of the Islamization of knowledge. He did the reinterpretation (Islamization)
of the terminologies which had been Westernised. Starting from the term “ilmu”
or knowledge).
The ignorance of the world population like this becomes the main support of the
American empire. This ignorance gives strength to America to wage the Afghan and
Iraq wars, because many people of the world “unknowingly” justify the
rationalization of the actions. This ignorance gives strength to America to
intervene the madrassa to remove the jihad materials from the curriculum,
because the people of the world agrees that the word jihad in the Newspeak
Dictionary means terrorism. The ignorance of the people of the world makes the
audience give applause during Obama's speech in Cairo which was frothing with
“mutual respect” between the West and Islam, while at the same time, his men
were dropping bombs in Pakistan!
Nearly three decades ago, that novel of Orwell was as if presenting a satire to
that of America's behaviour when mentioning the slogan of the Ing-Soc Party in
the Orwellian state of Oceania: "IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH".
Yes, our ignorance is the strength of the empire. Where the limit of our
ignorance lies, it is also as far as there where the zone of the Empirical
strength extends. To fight the strength of the empire is the same as fighting
our own ignorance. Ignorance towards our religion, ignorance toward the plots of
the enemies of Islam. “1984” features a resistance leader named “Emmanuel
Goldstein” who is against the tide of the newspeak with his common sense, even
though he has to be eliminated by the Ing-Soc regime and then becomes the victim
of the “newspeak”: a criminal who should be despised, reviled and scorned.
Exactly the same as the strangers (ghuraba) today, to fight the ignorance (jahiliyah)
we must necessarily be a victim of the newspeak: stigmatized as
radical-fundamentalist, the enemies of the whole world. Rasulullah SAW said,
بَدَأَ الْإِسْلَامُ غَرِيبًا وَسَيَعُودُ غَرِيبًا كَمَا بَدَأَ فَطُوبَى لِلْغُرَبَاءِ
“Islam was strange when it began and will one day be strange again; Blessed are the ghuraba' (those strange people)” (HR Muslim)
Islam becomes
estranged when resisting the tide of the ideology of newspeak. However, that's
precisely our job. At the time when the world, as far as the mind, is controlled
by the Empirical power, the first step in the fight is in the mind itself, the
revolution of thought. From the minds we are fighting against the ignorance,
into our real world we fighting against the strength.
Original author:
Reza Ageung S.
A Student of Hidayatullah High School of Shari'ah Science,
Balikpapan, Indonesia.
Translated and submitted by a Mujahid